Toxicity Scores & Embeddings

YOUR LIFE STYLE IS MORE EXPENSIVE!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU MUST PARTY, YOU MUST TRAVEL, YOU MUST GO ON VACATION, YOU MUST HAVE HUNDRED OF TATOOS THAT COST SO MUCH!!!! YOU MUST ALWAYS BUY NEW CLOTHES, NEW MODELS, NEW MANICURE PEDICURE, NEW HAIR CUTS, NEW CELL PHONE EVERY SEASON, NEW CAR, NEW THIS NEW THAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU LIFE STYLE IS HOLDING YOU BACK, NOT THE IMMIGRANTS, THE IMMIGRANTS SPENT LESS AND HIDE THEIR MONEY!!!!!!!!MOST OF THE IMMIGRANT UNDERSTAND AND KNOW HOW TO CALCULATE THEIR MONTHLLYY MONEY!!!!!!!!! WHILE SOME CANADIANS WHO GREW UP AS A MIDDEL CLASS, ALL WHAT THEY KNOW IS SPENDING!!! AND ESPECIALLY WHEN SOME ONE LOVE PARTYING ALCOHOLE SMOKING AND THE LEGALIZED WEED, KEEPS YOUR MIND IN A TOO RELAXING MOTION NO MOTION YOU ARE MUTE FOR MONTHS TILL YOU LOSE YOU JOB!!!!THAN YOU GO CRY TO MOMY AND DADY!!!!!!!!! MOST OF IMMIGRANT COME FROM POOR COUNTRIES AND HARD LIFE THOUGH THEM THE VALUE OF THE PENNY!!!!!!!! I WAS MARRIED TO A CANADIAN HUSBAND, NO MATTER HOW MUCH HE MAKE MONTHLY, SINCE HE WAS WORKING IN SALES, HE WILL ALWAYS ALWAYS FIND A SPENDING AVENUE!! WE WERE SUPPOSED TO PUT MONEY ASSIDE FOR THE FUTURE OF OUR CHILDREN!!! HE WILL ALWYAS ALWAYS ALWAYS FIND A WAITING DEEP HOLE TO PLACE THEM IN!!!!!!!! HI LIFE WAS VERY VERY EROGANT!!!!!!!!!BUYING NEW CLOTHING TODAY, YOU WILL FIND THEM TRAINNING ON THE GROUND!!!EVEN MY SON WAS 7 YEARS OLD AT THE TIME, HE TOLD ME MOM THE TIE YOU BOUGHT MY DAD RECENTLY IS ON THE GROUND!!!!!!THAT SPEAK FOR ALL HIS CLOTHING!!!! HIS MOM WAS THE MAN OF THE HOUSE HE USED SAY WHEN HE WAKES UP IN THE MORNING WHEN HE WAS YOUNGER, HE WILL FIND HIS MOM PICKED UP HIS DIRTY CLOTHES AND PLACE THE FRESHLY WASHED CLOTHING BESIDE HIS BED!!!! SOME PARENT DID TOO MUCH FOR THEIR CHILDREN,, AND THESE KIDS GROW UP TO BE LESS MOTIVATED, FOR WHAT THEY GOT EVERYTHING WHEN THEY GREW UP,!!!! AND THE POOR DIDN'T HAVE THAT SO THEY WORK HARD TO HAVE THAT WHAT WAS MISSING IN HIS CHILDHOOD AND YOUTH!!!!!!!!

🚩🚫🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩 🌙 1. **Ras Leela with married women** Bhagavata Purana 10.33.27 Krishna danced with married Gopis in the forest at night. Even though they left their husbands, the scripture says: Whatever Krishna does is pure, even if He plays with others’ wives. 🛑 Normalizes adultery under divine excuse. 🩲 2. **Stealing clothes and watching girls naked** Bhagavata Purana 10.22.1 to 10.22.28 Krishna hides the clothes of young bathing girls, climbs a tree, and watches them come out of the river **naked with hands raised**. He says it’s a test of their devotion. 😳 Highly inappropriate by any ethical standard. 💍 3. **Sex with 16,000 women** Bhagavata Purana 10.59.42 After killing Narakasura, Krishna takes 16,000 captive women as wives. He is said to live with them all by creating multiple forms of himself. ⚠️ Glorifies mass polygamy and male domination. 🧈 4. **Stealing butter and lying about it** Bhagavata Purana 10.8 to 10.11 Krishna frequently steals butter from villagers and breaks their pots. Even when caught, he lies and charms his way out. 😂 Presented as playful, but glorifies theft and dishonesty. 🔪 5. **Killing Ekalavya, a tribal archer** Mahabharata, Adi Parva and Bhagavata Purana 10.52.31 Ekalavya, a low-caste boy, learns archery on his own. Drona cuts off his thumb. Later Krishna kills him, calling him unrighteous. 🚫 Reinforces caste violence against talented lower-caste individuals. 📿 6. **Supports caste system in Gita** Bhagavad Gita 4.13 Krishna says: I created the four varnas (castes) based on qualities and actions. Although interpreted philosophically, this verse was used for centuries to enforce caste discrimination. 📛 Justifies systemic social inequality. 🗣️ 7. **Killing Shishupala for verbal insults** Mahabharata, Sabha Parva During a royal ceremony, Shishupala mocks Krishna. Krishna responds by using his chakra to **behead him publicly**. 🧠 Kills someone for speech — raises moral concerns. #rama Unethical, Weird ❌🚩🚩🚩🚩👺🚩🚩❤🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩 Acts of Rama in Ramayana These are all from mainstream Valmiki Ramayana or well-known regional versions. 1. 💔 Banishing Sita While Pregnant — Based on Gossip Rama sends Sita to the forest alone while she is pregnant, based on a washerman’s comment about her “purity.” 🕉️ Uttara Kanda, Valmiki Ramayana “A ruler must be free from blame. I banish you to uphold my people’s trust.” Comment: Seriously? Gossip over your wife? This is not ideal leadership or love — it’s cruel and cowardly. 2. ⚔️ Killing Shambuka the Shudra for Doing Tapas Rama beheads a Shudra ascetic just because he was doing penance in the forest, which “violated dharma.” 🕉️ Uttara Kanda, Ramayana “By performing penance, the Shudra threatens the cosmic order. He must die.” Comment: Casteist horror. What kind of god kills someone for meditating? 3. 🐒 Making Monkeys Fight His War Instead of asking help from humans, Rama uses an army of monkeys (Vanaras) — like Hanuman, Sugreeva, etc. 🔹 Comment: Literal monkey business. Why use animals for war instead of diplomacy? Slaying Vali Unfairly from Behind a Tree Rama hides and shoots Vali from behind while he's fighting someone else (Sugreeva). 🕉️ Kishkindha Kanda “A king can kill from hiding when dharma is at stake.” 🔹 Comment: That’s just sneaky and cowardly, not heroic. 🔥 Asking Sita to Do Agni Pariksha (Fire Test) After rescuing her from Ravana, Rama demands she walk through fire to prove her purity. 🕉️ Yuddha Kanda, Valmiki Ramayana “I rescued you for honor, not for love. Prove your chastity.” 🔹 Comment: Toxic masculinity. Instead of comforting her, he humiliates her. Never Defending Sita Against Critics He allows society to question Sita again and again, never confronting the toxic moral policing. 🔹 Comment: Doesn’t defend his wife. Silent when he should speak. 7. 🪦 Abandoning His Children in Forest His twin sons, Lava and Kusha, are born and raised without knowing who their father is. 🔹 Comment: A father who abandons family, then fights his own sons without knowing. Blind Obedience to Dharma, No Compassion Rama is shown as a king who follows “Rajdharma” even when it destroys his personal life. 🔹 Comment: Robot-like morality — no real humanity or emotion. ❓🤔 So… Why the “Jai Shri Ram” Hype? Originally a devotional phrase, “Jai Shri Ram” has now become: 🚩 1. Political Slogan (Not JustReligious) Widely used by Hindutva groups (like RSS, Bajrang Dal, etc.) Chanted during hate crimes, riots, and lynchings Used to assert Hindu supremacy, not peace or devotion Brainwashed Symbolism Kids in schools, people on streets forced to chant it Becomes reflex rather than real devotion 🔊 3. Used in Intimidation Many victims of hate attacks in India were forced to chant “Jai Shri Ram” before being beaten or killed. 🔹 Example: Tabrez (Jharkhand), 2019 🔹 Example: Delhi Riots, 2020 Fake Masculinity & Heroism Rama is projected as “Hindu warrior king” — even though real Ramayana presents him as soft, conflicted, and Fake Masculinity & Heroism Rama is projected as “Hindu warrior king” — even though real Ramayana presents him as soft, conflicted, and emotional The aggressive macho image is fake propaganda

Sad to see how unintelligent majority off humanity really are so superstitious and do not follow the evidence.. How can you worship sticks and stones and other earthly materials that which you carve with your own hands.. Why do they worship that which does not benefit them neither can do any harm to their enemies. You leave the one and only real God Allah who created everything in the heavens and earth and worship that which depends on your own hands or tounge(superstitious stories). Please wake up and stop worshipping idols stop following blindly like blind sheep your forefathers and ancestors. They were not educated neither they were guided.. this generation is more educated and have more access to real knowledge will You Still Believe milk is green just because your ancestors used to believe that reminds me of the following verses of the Holy Quran وَإِذَا قِيلَ لَهُمُ اتَّبِعُوا مَا أَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ قَالُوا بَلْ نَتَّبِعُ مَا أَلْفَيْنَا عَلَيْهِ آبَاءَنَا ۗ أَوَلَوْ كَانَ آبَاؤُهُمْ لَا يَعْقِلُونَ شَيْئًا وَلَا يَهْتَدُونَ When it is said to them: \\Follow what Allah has sent down.\\" They say: \\"Nay! We shall follow what we found our fathers following.\\" (Would they do that!) Even though their fathers did not understand anything nor were they guided? (Al-Baqarah 2:170)" وَمَثَلُ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا كَمَثَلِ الَّذِي يَنْعِقُ بِمَا لَا يَسْمَعُ إِلَّا دُعَاءً وَنِدَاءً ۚ صُمٌّ بُكْمٌ عُمْيٌ فَهُمْ لَا يَعْقِلُونَ And the example of those who disbelieve, is as that of him who shouts to the (flock of sheep) that hears nothing but calls and cries. (They are) deaf, dumb and blind. So they do not understand. (Al-Baqarah 2:171) And another place in Quran (sura ambia (prophets) /) Ibrahim (Abraham) asked the idol worshippers.... 52. When he said to his father and his people: "What are these images, to which you are devoted?" 53. They said:"We found our fathers worshipping them." 54. He said: "Indeed you and your fathers have been in manifest error." 55. They said: "Have you brought us the truth, or are you one of those who play about?" 56. He said: "Nay, your Lord is the Lord of the heavens and the earth, Who created them and of that I am one of the witnesses. 57. "And by Allah, I shall plot a plan (to destroy) your idols after you have gone away and turned your backs." 58. So he broke them to pieces, (all) except the biggest of them, that they might turn to it. 59. They said: "Who has done this to our aliha (gods)? He must indeed be one of the wrong-doers." 60. They said: "We heard a young man talking (against) them who is called Ibrahim (Abraham)." 61. They said: "Then bring him before the eyes of the people, that they may testify." 62. They said: "Are you the one who has done this to our gods, O Ibrahim (Abraham)?" 63. [Ibrahim (Abraham)] said: "Nay, this one, the biggest of them (idols) did it. Ask them, if they can speak!" 64. So they turned to themselves and said: "Verily, you are the Zalimun (polytheists and wrong-doers)." 65. Then they turned to themselves (their first thought and said): "Indeed you [Ibrahim (Abraham)] know well that these (idols) speak not!" 66. [Ibrahim (Abraham)] said: "Do you then worship besides Allah, things that can neither profit you, nor harm you? 67. "Fie upon you, and upon that which you worship besides Allah! Have you then no sense?" I pray to the true one and only God Allah guides us all. Ameen Love and Peace... Just to let the unintelligent Haters know , I do not come back to my comments I just write and move on and wish the BEST🌹

As a Canada who speaks both French and English and who follows politics quite closely, I have to say that the headline and some of the reporting here is quite misleading. A reduction in immigration has broad support across Canada. I wouldn't say that notion is dividing the country in any significant way. You do have certain industry groups that disagree, but among the population these reductions have broad support. This is a historic change in public opinion in Canada, but it has been driven by the unprecedented increase in immigration under the last term of the Trudeau government. To put this in context, non-permanent residents in Canada numbered around 1.5 million on Q3 2023, but by Q3 2025, that number sat a just over 3 million. The previous government increased immigration targets by 3 or 4 times over what they had been for years, which caused a number of economic issues. Essentially, the volume was simply too high for the economy and society to support. This was unfair to both Canadians and new comers, many of which could not find employment or afford a decent place to live. The changes being suggested are largely bringing Canada back to what the targets were for over a decade before, though a bit lower to account for the sudden surge. Canada remains one of the most pro-immigration countries in the world. However, and this is where I think DW's reporting is misleading, there is a distinction to be made between policies at the federal level and policies at the provincial level. Immigration, per our constitution, is a federal matter, however, Quebec in particular is distinct from other provinces. I don't mean only culturally and linguistically, but also in the powers that have been devolved to it by the federal government. On the question of immigration, Quebec has more powers and more ability to set its immigration targets and programs than any of the other 9 provinces. The particular program discussed here, the Quebec Experience Program (PEQ), is a particular immigration stream that only existed in Quebec. So what is happening with that program cannot be labeled as a whole-of-Canada thing. Where the changes to the PEQ are controversial, unlike the general changes at the federal level, is that people who immigrated under that specific program were promised certain things. There was a multi-year time line to Permanent Residency and then Citizenship. Many of those people have been in Quebec for 5-8 years already. However, the changes made to the program were done in such a way where people who many years into the program, had gotten an education, started a career, had children, ect. are now being told they can't continue and must leave Canada. There are even stories of people who married Canadians, now have children, and the one parent who was under this program now faces the possibility of having to leave Canada and be separated from their family. All through no fault of their own. That is what many people see as unfair, and I agree, however limiting future applications under the program, to bring in less people, that is not controversial. Canada has no responsibility to bring in people who are not already in Canada, but Canada does have some responsibility towards people who uprooted their lives to move to Canada and built new lives here based on promises and representations made to them by the Canadian and Quebecois governments. We should no simply kick those people out of the country.