Toxicity Scores & Embeddings

Canada will have 100 million people by the year 2100, the century initiative. Look it up.

And let me give you just an instance a Chevrolet Tahoe in the states is under 60 grand in Canada and looking at 80 grand 100 grand give or take

Or do the right thing and just stay home. Snowbirds... I'm looking at you!

Looks good on kanada...

Same old story, if we only look for the desired result, the cause remains unchanged...

I knew that "safe house" looked familiar. I used to live down the street. That's 230 15th avenue Lachine Quebec.

my tax dollars finally in works for a good reason. We should be looking for much stricter laws than C12

Law enforcement cherry pick the laws they wish to enforce. I can give proof of this with Federal law enforcement and local law enforcement. If you got the money, they will look the other way. But if you are a poor victim, they will shug at you and tell you they are "sorry, but the system is Broken". The same system that pays them, and the crimes get worst.

Don’t blame USA for the lack of Canadian government responsibilities…last 10 years look at how Canada has had increased crime, drugs, look what’s going on in Surrey BC…..huge drug busts in Okanagan with street guns….so being proactive on safety in the so called “new world” now….is positive…

canadians are just straight confused if they are choosing to go down there voluntarily 🤦‍♂️ probably the albertan separatists looking for a new home 😂

What do you expect look at our immigration problems Canada is bringing in so many immigrants that they do not vet. Also our errogant superior attitude is hurting our reputation and insulting theie president doesn't help. Canada is not the same country it was over 10 years ago.

Looks like someone got there feeling hurt sorry for not living up to your expectations 😂

Why is Pierre bringing Immigration law that’s why I’m not voting for him are no goverment Canada always follow the American he’s bringing tuf immigrating laws Canada is going to become like America like what trump is doing that’s why America treated Canadian the way they does Canadian always follow the American I have seen trump in Pierre look what trum put Canada through and he brieng in that immigration law it’s Just going to make Canada like america

Why is Pierre bringing Immigration law that’s why I’m not voting for him are no goverment Canada always follow the American he’s bringing tuf immigrating laws Canada is going to become like America like what trump is doing that’s why America treated Canadian the way they does Canadian always follow the American I have seen trump in Pierre look what trum put Canada through and he brieng in that immigration law it’s Just going to make Canada like america

I love it visiting the States. I wish our leadership would look after our country.

We should be sending some back the damage has been done already look at rent and housing .

Good. It’s time we look after our own for once.

I have the answer - I am never going to the States again and I find this decision very easy to take as Canada is far nicer and is a free country - remember what free looked like.

You brought 5 million peoples all over the world without even background check and what do u expect? Soon other countries will also do the same things with canada look at canada 4 million to 5 million temporary resident in canada

Heightened scrutiny undermines Canada's reputation as a welcoming destination? Isn't this the point? Meanwhile, lax policies allow too much abuse of our "wecoming" system. Finally, with the US tightening their borders, Canada will be the desired destination for North America, and our policies must prepare for this likely outcome. One last point is this: i would rather this country take care of the first nations peoples, the dispossessed, those marginalized within our society and our elderly who've contributed to this country's growth and prosperity but, due to one or another reason, dont have workplace pensions for retirement. Once we've sorted out our own peoples, seen properly to the needs of those who were actually born here, ensured our hospitals and schools are well funded, then we can look to service the needs of a migrant population.

I am supportive of immigration, but I believe there should be a cap of no more than 1-2.5% annually. A significant number of migrants moving to Canada from the same region or country could cause issues, as this can lead to the formation of "mini-bubble" societies within Canada. These groups may sometimes become the dominant demographic and undermine the existing communities that have contributed to building Canada for decades. We cannot expect new immigrants to seamlessly merge into Canadian society. This is a major oversight by Canada’s Immigration Department. Digital applications from foreign nations may play a role in this phenomenon. There should also be regulations concerning how many new immigrants can be brought in by family members. For instance, one new citizen can legally bring both of their parents and their spouse, which is fair. However, there have been cases where this process is repeated multiple times within ten years, leading to a 1:15 ratio, where one person can bring in six to eight relatives. If there is a labor shortage in essential fields, Canada can offer long-term residency to those who continue to work in those sectors, such as caretakers. However, the pathway to citizenship could be lengthened or require a higher standard. For instance, the requirements could extend from X years of living in Canada to X+5 years, as well as passing a basic Canadian citizenship test, either written or verbal. While an increase of five years may seem unfair or lengthy, it is essential. A newborn child from a Canadian family requires 18 years to gain voting rights in elections, whereas new immigrants—especially those who come for study for four to six years—can potentially gain both citizenship and voting rights sooner if they meet the previous administration's standard. Children under the age of 18 can gain citizenship in as little as X-4 years, regardless of their full integration into Canadian society. This loophole is sometimes abused and provides preferential treatment that favors this process over existing Canadian. In my opinion, it would be fairer to calculate the duration of "living in Canada" based on the number of years they have paid "income taxes" in Canada. This is important because many individuals with multiple passports pay taxes elsewhere while benefiting from Canadian healthcare and other services. The investment in home buying as a pathway to citizenship has contributed to the housing crisis, resulting in numerous empty homes in various regions. While it may offer short-term economic benefits that some politicians favor, it is detrimental to Canada as a whole. If buying a house is the only requirement for citizenship, wouldn't a large portion of the global population be eligible for U.S. citizenship just by investing in U.S. businesses or stocks? This perspective may seem illogical when looking at it from outside the box. Apologies for being a bit wordy; I had much more to say. Nonetheless, I also support temporary residency for up to 6-9 months for those who have been evacuated due to war, natural disasters, or similar circumstances. Special exceptions can be granted for families with members working in critical fields that merit such considerations (high-end industry).